Various attempts have been made, at least superficially, to locate the name of
the prophet in Rig Veda. Although the name ‘Jarutha’ appears thrice in the bulk
of the Rig Veda, the scholars seem inclined to reject the identification. Let
us not forget here that Zarathustra is spelled differently in other languages,
such as Zarathustra is spelled as Zoroaster in Greek. The other Iranian versions
spell the same as Zarathrost, Zaradust or Zaradrust etc. In Sanskrit, Zarathushtra
is spelled as Jarathuśtra (in Neriyosangh’s translation of the Avesta). The
etymology of the name given is Zarath (old)+Ustra (camel) or Zarath (driving or
moving)+ Ustra (Camel). Similarly, the word Zarat denotes the priest or
singer. (http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/zoroaster-i-the-name)
Let us not forget here that the phoneme Z finds loss in Vedic language, turns
to J, Zarath will thus come to be spelled as Jarath. With phonetic changes,
while shortening the name Zarathustra, the name can come, too, be spelled as
Jarutha in Vedic dialect. Another supportive information we get as, “The name
Jarutha is derived by Sayana from Vgr, to 'sing, saying ; it means one who
makes loud sound. ... form in its own way simply copied it from Vedic, for the
Avestan Gen. form of hartr would, on the analogy of datr, be zarthro or
*zarithro.” (The Indian Historical Quarterly, Volume 5, Issues 1-2, page
269-70, 1985)
Let us have a look at the Rig Vedic verses where
Jarutha is mentioned and in what context.
“Burn up all malice with those flames, O Agni,
wherewith of old thou burntest up Jarutha,And drive away in silence pain and
sickness.” (RV 7.1.7 Trans. By Griffith)
“Vasiṣṭha, when enkindling thee, O Agni, hath slain
Jarutha. Give us wealth in plenty. Sing praise in choral song, O Jātavedas. Ye
Gods, preserve us evermore with blessings.” (RV 7.9.6 Trans. By Griffith)
“Agni rejoiced the car of him who praised him, and
from the waters, burnt away Jarutha. Agni saved Atri in the fiery cave and made
Nrmedha rich with troops of children.” (RV 10.80.3, Trans. By Griffith.)
However, Macdonell defines Jarutha to denote a demon
that was slain by Agni. He also referees to the Griffith and Ludwig those see
in him (Jarutha), a foe slain in the battle in which Vasishtha was the priest.
(Vedic Index of Names and Subjects, Volume 1; Volume 5, By Arthur Anthony
Macdonell, Arthur Berriedale Keith, page 279, reprint 1995). Hodivala after
examining all the three verses states, “From the third passage, it is clear
that Jarutha must have been some demon who lived in waters.” (Hodivala,
Zharathushtra and his contemporaries in the Rigveda, 1913, page 1.) However,
Hodivala examines further to conclude that Zarathustra is mentioned in the Rig
Veda as ‘Dasyu’ because he was frequently called as ‘Dakhyuma’ (equivalent to
Rig Vedic Dasyu) and wherever, the word is used in plural form, i.e. Dasyus, it
is addressed to his followers.
Let us examine the verses mentioned above to find
what they mean. All the three verses laud the deed of Agni for killing ‘Jarutha’
in fire. There is no mention anywhere in Rig Veda that Jarutha denotes a demon
or foe. Rather, it seems odd to find mention of Jarutha’s thrice to describing
only event of his killing in the fire.
Some scholars have associated Jarutha of Rig Veda
with Zarathushtra of Avesta. Indian scholar P. R. Deshmukh states, “…From the
above Richa we learn that Jarutha was killed by Vashishthas by crossing
water…..The word Jarutha means a priest…..Jarutha may be a short form of
Zartustra.” (Indus civilisation, Rigveda, and Hindu culture, by P. R. Deshmukh,
page 288-89, 1982)
Apart from above two references, Jackson has given
detailed accounts of Zarathushtra’s death gathered from various sources, some
are listed briefly as below:
1. Early
Greek tradition says that Zoroaster was perished by lightning or a flame from
heaven. Latin tradition states that an angry star emitted a stream of fire in
vengeance for his conjuring up the stars and burnt him to ashes.
2. Gregory
of Tours (A.D. 538-593) records etymology of Zoroaster as ‘living star’ stating
that the Persians worshipped him as a God because he was consumed by fire from
heaven.
3. Chronicon
Alexandrinum (A.D.629) states that while praying to the Orion, he was slain by
a heavenly shaft and that his ashes were carefully kept by the Persians.
4. Suidas
of Tenth century A.D. briefly records the prophet’s death by fire from heaven.
5. Orosius
A.D. 5th Century) informs that Ninus conquered Zoroaster and killed him in the
battle.
6. Iranian
traditions inform that the prophet died at the age of 77 years and 40 days and
ascribes the death it to a Turanian named BrAtrOkrEsh. The name of the murderer
occurs several times in the Avestan scriptures.
7. Datistan
– I Dinik, 72.8, states that among the most heinous sinners “one was Tur – e-
Bratarvaksh, the Karap and heterodox wizard, by whom best of the man (i.e.
Jharatusht) was put to death.” The similar account is given by Bundahishn
naming the above cited assassin.
8. Dk.
III, chap. 343 lists the best and worst of men, naming Yam as the best of
kings, and Zardušt as the best of priests, and Tūr ī Brātrōkrēš, the karb “who
made the body of Zardušt perish,” as the worst of heretics. (Karb stands for
Old Avestan Karapan, despised priests of the enemy. The assassin in question in
all probabilities was a priest-warrior.)
Apart from Greek and Latin, Pahlavi-Parsi tradition
is unanimous that the Zoroaster perished at the hands of Tur-i- BrAtrOkrEsh.
Shahname, too, confirms the account of assassination of the Prophet by Turanian
raiders at the fire-temple. (See for
detailed information “Zoroaster: The Prophet of Ancient Iran” by A. V. Williams
Jackson, page 124-132, 1899)
(During the ritual service, Hyaona insurgents
stabbed the 77-year-old Zarathushtra, slew his priests and burned the Avesta.”
Thus states Snodgrass in Encyclopedia of the Literature of Empire. (By Mary
Ellen Snodgrass, page 20) Hyaona was the tribe which was led by Zarathushtra’s
staunch enemy Arjaspa.
What we learn from above is Zarathustra’s death was
not natural. Most of the accounts agree that he was killed in the fire or he
along with his priests was killed and later burnt in a fire temple, while he
was praying. The assassin was a Turanian named BrAtrOkrEsh, may be a General,
leading Turanian raiding party to Balkh. The news of the killing of the prophet
must have spread across the regions adding imaginary details to it for want of
accurate details of the incident, some traditions, such as Greek, attributed
the death to the ‘fire’ from heaven. Let us not forget here that the Greeks
knew Zarathushtra as magician and astrologer or even a sorcerer.
However, Zoroastrians did not commemorate martyrdom
of their prophet because in all probability, the old tradition was more
interested in his life and teachings than his physical death.
Now, if we reread the Rig Vedic verses, we easily
can correlate them with the other legends associated with the Zarathushtra’s
death in fire, in all probability, an outcome of a war with Turanians to whom
we have identified with Turvasas of Rig Veda, who were sometimes friendly with
Rig Vedic tribe. It just cannot be a coincidence that all accounts in relation
with Zarathushtra’s death approximately match with the Rig Vedic verses.
Turanians, too, were friendly with Zarathushtra in the beginning which is
evidenced by Zarathushtra himself in the Gathas as under:
“Since through righteousness, the powerful children
and grandchildren of the Turanian Fryana have risen to promote their world
through serenity with zeal, Wise God has united them with good mind, in order
to teach them what concerns their help.” (Gathas: 11-12)
It just shows that the inter-tribal and inter-faith
relationship bonds were not permanent. Turvasas had fought against Sudasa in
Battle of Ten Kings though many a times, they have shown intimate friendly
relations.
However, we cannot of course, attribute the death to
Vasishtha, as no Rig Vedic verse suggests that the assassination of Zarathushtra
was committed by Vasishtha. In the verses composed by him, he attributes the
death to ‘Agni’, fire. In fact, in the verse RV 7.9.6, he seems to be rejoicing
the death of enemy Jarutha. Looking at the rivalry between Rig Vedic and
Avestan people, becoming Vasishtha overjoyous and reflecting it in the verses
composed by him (or his family members) can be understood. Vasishtha seems to
have recorded the incident in the peculiar Vedic style. The verse 10.80.3 seems
to be of far later times which have added confusing element of Atri in it.
As Hodivala’s inference that Zarathushtra is
mentioned in Rig Veda as Dasyu is thus undoubtedly correct as during
Zarathustra’s life time, for sake of the rivalry, Vedic seers must have called
him not by his personal name but contemptuous form of his epithet, Dasyu
(Dakhyuma). There are many other proofs, too, to confirm beyond doubt that
Zarathushtra was contemporaneous to the Rig Vedic seers which we will see in
the present chapter. To sum up conclusively, in all, Jarutha of Rig Veda can be
none other than Zarathushtra of Avesta.
(From my forthcoming book)
(From my forthcoming book)